This opponent (AFC Wimbledon) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
AFC Wimbledon
Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.5
Avg scored
0.7
Avg conceded
0.8
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.93
0.70
1.21
0.57
0.69
0.81
vs Stronger (4)
1.00
0.25
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
vs Similar (24)
0.92
0.75
1.08
0.67
0.75
0.83
vs Weaker (2)
1.00
1.00
-
-
1.00
1.00
Clean sheet %
43% (+15pp vs league)
This opponent (Reading) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Total goals distribution
The model estimates around 2.2 goals in this match; the single most likely total is 2 (28%).
Over/Under 1.5Actual: Over
Over 1.5
64.7%
Under 1.5
35.3%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Over/Under 2.5Actual: Over
Over 2.5
36.5%
@ 2.30-4.0%
Under 2.5
63.5%
@ 1.56+4.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Over/Under 3.5Actual: Under
Over 3.5
17.1%
Under 3.5
82.9%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Both teams to scoreActual: Yes
Yes
44.8%
No
55.2%
Best 5 market prices
Yes
No market prices yet.
No
No market prices yet.
Correct score
Top 8 scorelines with probability, best odds and edge (left); the full probability grid (right).
1-1
14.8%
0-0
13.0%
1-0
11.4%
0-1
10.9%
2-1
7.4%
1-2 ✓
7.1%
2-0
7.0%
0-2
6.5%
Reading goals ↓
AFC Wimbledon goals →
0
1
2
3
4
0
13%
11%
6.5%
2.3%
0.6%
1
11%
15%
7.1%
2.5%
0.7%
2
7.0%
7.4%
3.9%
1.4%
0.4%
3
2.6%
2.7%
1.4%
0.5%
0.1%
4
0.7%
0.7%
0.4%
0.1%
0.0%
Each cell is the % chance of that exact scoreline. Rows = Reading goals (down), columns = AFC Wimbledon goals (across).
💪 3. Team Strengths Analysis
🏆 Total PPG
Points / game
Lincoln
2.24
Cardiff
1.98
Bolton
1.71
Stockport
1.69
Luton
1.61
Bradford
1.60
Plymouth
1.59
Stevenage
1.56
Huddersfield
1.46
Mansfield
1.41
Reading
1.37
Wycombe
1.37
Blackpool
1.30
Doncaster
1.30
Barnsley
1.28
Wigan
1.22
Burton
1.17
AFC Wimbledon
1.15
Peterboro
1.15
Leyton Orient
1.13
Exeter
1.07
Port Vale
0.91
Rotherham
0.89
Northampton
0.76
Reading is 0.22 points better than AFC Wimbledon in terms of average points per game (1.37 vs 1.15).
⚔️ Attack
Goals scored / game
Cardiff
1.96
Lincoln
1.93
Plymouth
1.63
Huddersfield
1.61
Bolton
1.55
Stockport
1.53
Wycombe
1.50
Barnsley
1.48
Luton
1.48
Reading
1.39
Peterboro
1.39
Mansfield
1.35
Leyton Orient
1.28
Bradford
1.21
Blackpool
1.17
Exeter
1.13
AFC Wimbledon
1.11
Doncaster
1.09
Burton
1.09
Wigan
1.07
Stevenage
1.02
Rotherham
0.89
Northampton
0.85
Port Vale
0.78
Reading is 0.28 goals better than AFC Wimbledon in terms of goals scored per game (1.39 vs 1.11).
🛡️ Defense
Conceded / game · lower better
Lincoln
0.89
Stevenage
1.02
Bolton
1.08
Mansfield
1.09
Cardiff
1.09
Bradford
1.10
Luton
1.22
Wigan
1.26
Wycombe
1.26
Stockport
1.27
Reading
1.30
Burton
1.30
Port Vale
1.33
Exeter
1.33
Plymouth
1.37
Huddersfield
1.39
Blackpool
1.41
Peterboro
1.48
Doncaster
1.50
Leyton Orient
1.54
Rotherham
1.54
AFC Wimbledon
1.57
Barnsley
1.59
Northampton
1.61
Reading is 0.26 goals better than AFC Wimbledon in terms of goals conceded per game (1.30 vs 1.57).
⏱️ Possession
Avg possession %
Cardiff
63%
Bolton
59%
Luton
56%
Peterboro
55%
Stockport
55%
Wycombe
54%
Leyton Orient
52%
Barnsley
52%
Exeter
51%
Doncaster
50%
Reading
50%
Bradford
50%
Huddersfield
50%
Plymouth
48%
AFC Wimbledon
46%
Blackpool
46%
Port Vale
46%
Burton
46%
Mansfield
46%
Rotherham
46%
Wigan
45%
Stevenage
45%
Northampton
45%
Lincoln
42%
Reading is 3.8 percentage points better than AFC Wimbledon in terms of average possession (50% vs 46%).
🎲 4. Props Analysis
Reading
For 5.5 · Against 6.2 · Total 11.7
🚩 Corners
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 1.9 · Against 1.9 · Total 3.8
🟨 Cards
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 11.2 · Against 13.1 · Total 24.3
⚠️ Fouls
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
AFC Wimbledon
For 4.1 · Against 5.2 · Total 9.3
🚩 Corners
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 2.2 · Against 0.8 · Total 3.0
🟨 Cards
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 13.6 · Against 10.2 · Total 23.8
⚠️ Fouls
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
Reading
Split
Corners
Cards
Fouls
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Overall (50)
10.4
9.8
11.0
3.3
3.7
2.9
23.1
24.0
22.3
vs Stronger (10)
7.6
6.2
9.0
2.8
2.3
3.5
24.5
22.8
26.2
vs Similar (38)
10.9
10.7
11.0
3.5
4.2
2.7
22.9
24.5
21.5
vs Weaker (2)
13.5
8.0
19.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
20.5
19.0
22.0
% over line
60%
52%
67%
46%
54%
38%
70%
78%
62%
% under line
40%
48%
33%
54%
46%
62%
30%
22%
38%
This opponent (AFC Wimbledon) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
AFC Wimbledon
Split
Corners
Cards
Fouls
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Overall (50)
9.2
8.6
9.8
3.6
3.4
3.8
23.5
23.1
23.8
vs Stronger (10)
7.2
7.0
7.3
1.3
0.6
2.0
24.5
23.0
26.0
vs Similar (36)
9.5
8.7
10.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
23.4
23.4
23.4
vs Weaker (4)
9.5
9.5
9.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
22.8
21.0
24.5
% over line
46%
30%
61%
48%
44%
52%
61%
65%
57%
% under line
54%
70%
39%
52%
56%
48%
39%
35%
43%
This opponent (Reading) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
🚩 Total Corners
Match total corners / game
Barnsley
11.0
Huddersfield
10.9
Luton
10.6
Doncaster
10.6
Reading
10.4
Peterboro
10.2
Rotherham
10.0
Exeter
9.9
Plymouth
9.9
Stevenage
9.9
Port Vale
9.8
Bolton
9.8
Blackpool
9.7
Cardiff
9.7
Burton
9.6
Lincoln
9.5
Mansfield
9.5
Wigan
9.5
Leyton Orient
9.5
Bradford
9.2
Wycombe
9.2
Northampton
9.1
AFC Wimbledon
9.1
Stockport
8.5
🟨 Total Cards
Match total cards / game
Bolton
5.1
Bradford
4.8
Stevenage
4.2
Luton
4.1
Exeter
4.1
Peterboro
4.0
Stockport
4.0
Port Vale
4.0
Lincoln
3.9
AFC Wimbledon
3.9
Doncaster
3.8
Burton
3.8
Wycombe
3.8
Mansfield
3.8
Wigan
3.7
Northampton
3.7
Huddersfield
3.7
Cardiff
3.6
Barnsley
3.6
Leyton Orient
3.5
Plymouth
3.5
Reading
3.4
Blackpool
3.4
Rotherham
3.2
⚠️ Total Fouls
Match total fouls / game
Bolton
25.5
Stevenage
25.4
Stockport
25.0
Exeter
24.7
Wycombe
24.6
Luton
24.4
Bradford
24.4
Doncaster
24.1
Wigan
24.0
Rotherham
23.9
Lincoln
23.8
Mansfield
23.8
Peterboro
23.7
AFC Wimbledon
23.3
Reading
23.2
Plymouth
23.0
Northampton
22.7
Cardiff
22.7
Blackpool
22.6
Huddersfield
22.5
Port Vale
22.2
Leyton Orient
21.5
Burton
21.5
Barnsley
21.0
Corners O/U 9.5Actual: Under
Over 9.5
55.7%
Under 9.5
44.3%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cards O/U 3.5Actual: Under
Over 3.5
47.5%
Under 3.5
52.5%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Fouls O/U 21.5Actual: Under
Over 21.5
60.8%
Under 21.5
39.2%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🔀 5. Double Chance
Double Chance
Two of the three results in one selection. The probability is the sum of those outcomes from the model above, so any edge here is the market pricing the combination out of line with its own 1X2.
🥅 6. Home & Away Over/Under
⚖️ 7. Handicap
⏱️ 8. Half Time Goals O/U
Reading
Half Time · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
0.5
Avg scored
0.4
Avg conceded
0.1
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.40
0.23
0.38
0.19
0.43
0.29
vs Stronger (6)
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.40
2.00
0.00
vs Similar (22)
0.36
0.23
0.50
0.10
0.25
0.33
vs Weaker (2)
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
Clean sheet %
83% (+55pp vs league)
This opponent (AFC Wimbledon) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
AFC Wimbledon
Half Time · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
0.3
Avg scored
0.3
Avg conceded
0.0
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.40
0.17
0.50
0.14
0.31
0.19
vs Stronger (4)
0.75
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
vs Similar (24)
0.33
0.17
0.33
0.17
0.33
0.17
vs Weaker (2)
0.50
0.50
-
-
0.50
0.50
Clean sheet %
83% (+55pp vs league)
This opponent (Reading) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Half Time Over/Under 0.5Actual: Over
Over 0.5
0.0%
Under 0.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Half Time Over/Under 1.5Actual: Under
Over 1.5
0.0%
Under 1.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Half Time Over/Under 2.5Actual: Under
Over 2.5
0.0%
Under 2.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🥅 9. Half Time Home & Away O/U
How many goals each side scores in the first half on its own. Each line is modelled directly from that team's half-time goals rather than read off a scoreline grid, so unlike the full-time version the two sides need not sum exactly to the half-time match total.
Reading over/under 0.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Reading over/under 1.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Reading over/under 2.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 0.5 HTActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 1.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 2.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
⏱️ 10. Second Half Goals O/U
Reading
Second Half · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
2.2
Avg scored
1.1
Avg conceded
1.1
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.97
0.87
0.94
0.88
1.00
0.86
vs Stronger (6)
0.83
0.50
1.00
0.40
0.00
1.00
vs Similar (22)
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.10
1.00
0.83
vs Weaker (2)
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
Clean sheet %
33% (+5pp vs league)
This opponent (AFC Wimbledon) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
AFC Wimbledon
Second Half · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.2
Avg scored
0.4
Avg conceded
0.8
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.53
0.53
0.71
0.43
0.38
0.62
vs Stronger (4)
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
vs Similar (24)
0.58
0.58
0.75
0.50
0.42
0.67
vs Weaker (2)
0.50
0.50
-
-
0.50
0.50
Clean sheet %
57% (+29pp vs league)
This opponent (Reading) is Similar. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Second Half Over/Under 0.5Actual: Over
Over 0.5
0.0%
Under 0.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Second Half Over/Under 1.5Actual: Over
Over 1.5
0.0%
Under 1.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Second Half Over/Under 2.5Actual: Under
Over 2.5
0.0%
Under 2.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🥅 11. Second Half Home & Away O/U
How many goals each side scores in the second half on its own. Each line is modelled directly from that team's second-half goals rather than read off a scoreline grid, so unlike the full-time version the two sides need not sum exactly to the second-half match total.
Reading over/under 0.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Reading over/under 1.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Reading over/under 2.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 0.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 1.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
AFC Wimbledon over/under 2.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🔥 12. Top picks for this game
Every selection Pythia rates above 70%, ordered by probability. Use Min odds to match the prices you want: slide down for near-certainties at short prices, up for longer prices. Unpriced picks are ranked on the model's fair odds. Edge defaults to Yes, showing only selections priced BELOW what the model makes them; switch to All to include the rest, and picks we hold no price for. The five columns are the best market prices (highest first) for each pick; edge is vs the average. Result grades each pick against the final score.
Min odds1.20
Edge
Pick
Probability
Avg odds
Best 1
Best 2
Best 3
Best 4
Best 5
Edge
Result
Under 5.5 cards
85.0%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 3.5
82.9%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Over 19.5 fouls
76.0%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✗ Miss
Under 4.5 cards
71.5%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 25.5 fouls
71.0%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
No picks at these odds - lower the slider to see shorter-priced selections.
🎽 13. Player market rates
Reading
Anytime goalscorer
Matches in which the player scored
Jack Marriott58%
Lewis Wing21%
Andre Garcia17%
Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan16%
Mamadi Camara15%
Will Keane14%
Daniel Kyerewaa14%
Randell Williams13%
Kami Doyle9%
Paudie O’Connor8%
Haydon Roberts7%
Liam Fraser6%
Paddy Lane6%
Jeriel Dorsett5%
Charlie Savage4%
Matt Ritchie4%
Andy Yiadom0%
Joel Pereira0%
Ryan Nyambe0%
Derrick Williams0%
Andy Rinomhota0%
Jack Stevens0%
Tivonge Rushesha0%
Matty Jacob0%
Finley Burns0%
John Ryan0%
Ben Elliott0%
Michael Stickland0%
Kelvin Abrefa0%
Benn Ward0%
Kadan Young0%
Mark O'Mahony0%
Sean Patton0%
Ashqar Ahmed0%
To be booked (yellow)
Matches in which the player was booked
John Ryan33%
Paudie O’Connor31%
Ashqar Ahmed27%
Matty Jacob27%
Charlie Savage22%
Haydon Roberts21%
Derrick Williams21%
Andy Yiadom21%
Daniel Kyerewaa19%
Finley Burns18%
Matt Ritchie18%
Sean Patton17%
Jeriel Dorsett15%
Michael Stickland14%
Kadan Young14%
Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan14%
Benn Ward12%
Lewis Wing11%
Ryan Nyambe11%
Ben Elliott9%
Kami Doyle9%
Kelvin Abrefa8%
Andre Garcia8%
Mamadi Camara8%
Liam Fraser6%
Paddy Lane6%
Mark O'Mahony5%
Joel Pereira2%
Randell Williams0%
Jack Marriott0%
Andy Rinomhota0%
Will Keane0%
Jack Stevens0%
Tivonge Rushesha0%
Anytime assist
Matches in which the player assisted
Tivonge Rushesha33%
Lewis Wing21%
Matt Ritchie18%
Kami Doyle14%
Jack Marriott12%
Charlie Savage9%
Daniel Kyerewaa8%
Kelvin Abrefa8%
Andre Garcia8%
Haydon Roberts7%
Randell Williams7%
Paddy Lane6%
Derrick Williams4%
Jeriel Dorsett2%
Andy Yiadom0%
Joel Pereira0%
Ryan Nyambe0%
Andy Rinomhota0%
Will Keane0%
Jack Stevens0%
Paudie O’Connor0%
Liam Fraser0%
Matty Jacob0%
Finley Burns0%
John Ryan0%
Ben Elliott0%
Michael Stickland0%
Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan0%
Mamadi Camara0%
Benn Ward0%
Kadan Young0%
Mark O'Mahony0%
Sean Patton0%
Ashqar Ahmed0%
Over 2.5 shots
Matches with 3+ shots taken
Jack Marriott21%
Lewis Wing13%
Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan11%
Paddy Lane8%
Daniel Kyerewaa6%
Charlie Savage4%
Kami Doyle2%
Andy Yiadom0%
Joel Pereira0%
Randell Williams0%
Matt Ritchie0%
Ryan Nyambe0%
Derrick Williams0%
Andy Rinomhota0%
Will Keane0%
Jack Stevens0%
Paudie O’Connor0%
Liam Fraser0%
Tivonge Rushesha0%
Matty Jacob0%
Haydon Roberts0%
Finley Burns0%
Jeriel Dorsett0%
John Ryan0%
Ben Elliott0%
Michael Stickland0%
Kelvin Abrefa0%
Mamadi Camara0%
Benn Ward0%
Kadan Young0%
Mark O'Mahony0%
Sean Patton0%
Ashqar Ahmed0%
Andre Garcia0%
AFC Wimbledon
Anytime goalscorer
Matches in which the player scored
Mathew Stevens31%
Marcus Browne28%
James Tilley15%
Omar Bugiel12%
Antwoine Hackford11%
Danilo Orsi-Dadomo10%
Ryan Johnson10%
Junior Nkeng6%
Zack Nelson5%
Myles Hippolyte5%
Callum Maycock5%
Alistair Smith4%
Nathan Asiimwe3%
Jake Reeves3%
Steve Seddon2%
Josh Kelly0%
Sam Hutchinson0%
Patrick Bauer0%
Nathan Bishop0%
Joe McDonnell0%
Joe Lewis0%
Layton Stewart0%
Osman Foyo0%
Riley Harbottle0%
Aron Sasu0%
Isaac Ogundere0%
Kai Jennings0%
Robert Junior Nkeng0%
To be booked (yellow)
Matches in which the player was booked
Ryan Johnson26%
Jake Reeves23%
Joe Lewis19%
Myles Hippolyte18%
Marcus Browne17%
Steve Seddon15%
Riley Harbottle14%
Robert Junior Nkeng12%
Isaac Ogundere10%
Aron Sasu10%
Alistair Smith9%
Patrick Bauer8%
Omar Bugiel7%
Nathan Asiimwe5%
Nathan Bishop5%
Mathew Stevens3%
Antwoine Hackford3%
Callum Maycock2%
Josh Kelly0%
Sam Hutchinson0%
Joe McDonnell0%
James Tilley0%
Danilo Orsi-Dadomo0%
Layton Stewart0%
Osman Foyo0%
Zack Nelson0%
Kai Jennings0%
Junior Nkeng0%
Anytime assist
Matches in which the player assisted
Steve Seddon17%
James Tilley15%
Myles Hippolyte10%
Jake Reeves10%
Omar Bugiel10%
Mathew Stevens7%
Alistair Smith7%
Marcus Browne6%
Nathan Asiimwe5%
Zack Nelson5%
Callum Maycock5%
Danilo Orsi-Dadomo5%
Joe Lewis4%
Isaac Ogundere2%
Josh Kelly0%
Sam Hutchinson0%
Patrick Bauer0%
Nathan Bishop0%
Joe McDonnell0%
Ryan Johnson0%
Layton Stewart0%
Antwoine Hackford0%
Osman Foyo0%
Riley Harbottle0%
Aron Sasu0%
Kai Jennings0%
Robert Junior Nkeng0%
Junior Nkeng0%
Over 2.5 shots
Matches with 3+ shots taken
Marcus Browne19%
Junior Nkeng12%
James Tilley8%
Mathew Stevens7%
Danilo Orsi-Dadomo5%
Omar Bugiel5%
Alistair Smith4%
Nathan Asiimwe3%
Myles Hippolyte3%
Callum Maycock0%
Josh Kelly0%
Sam Hutchinson0%
Patrick Bauer0%
Nathan Bishop0%
Joe McDonnell0%
Steve Seddon0%
Ryan Johnson0%
Jake Reeves0%
Joe Lewis0%
Layton Stewart0%
Antwoine Hackford0%
Osman Foyo0%
Riley Harbottle0%
Aron Sasu0%
Isaac Ogundere0%
Zack Nelson0%
Kai Jennings0%
Robert Junior Nkeng0%
Players with at least 3 appearances, top 10 per market – scroll each card for the rest. These are shares of matches played, which is how these markets settle, not per-90 rates.
💰 14. Squad value
💰 Total value
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
CAR (25)
€29m
LUT (26)
€29m
BOL (22)
€17m
HUD (26)
€16m
PLY (25)
€13m
LIN (24)
€12m
BLA (22)
€11m
LO (23)
€10m
STO (25)
€10m
WYC (24)
€10m
REA (20)
€10m
BAR (21)
€8m
WIG (21)
€7m
PET (23)
€7m
BRA (21)
€7m
STE (21)
€7m
PV (23)
€7m
DON (23)
€7m
MAN (23)
€6m
AW (21)
€5m
BUR (17)
€5m
ROT (19)
€5m
NOR (18)
€3m
EXE (15)
€3m
Reading's squad is €4m more valuable than AFC Wimbledon's (€10m vs €5m).
⚔️ Attack
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
CAR (12)
€15m
LUT (10)
€13m
PLY (8)
€4m
LO (6)
€4m
BLA (8)
€4m
HUD (7)
€4m
BOL (6)
€4m
STO (8)
€3m
LIN (7)
€3m
REA (6)
€3m
BRA (9)
€3m
PET (8)
€3m
WYC (7)
€3m
AW (8)
€2m
STE (6)
€2m
WIG (8)
€2m
ROT (6)
€2m
PV (5)
€2m
DON (6)
€2m
BAR (5)
€2m
BUR (6)
€1m
MAN (6)
€1m
EXE (5)
€1m
NOR (5)
€1m
Reading and AFC Wimbledon have a similar attack value (both €3m).
🧠 Midfield
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
LUT (6)
€4m
BOL (4)
€4m
HUD (6)
€4m
CAR (3)
€4m
MAN (5)
€3m
LO (8)
€3m
REA (5)
€3m
STO (6)
€3m
BAR (7)
€3m
BLA (5)
€3m
PLY (6)
€3m
WIG (8)
€2m
WYC (5)
€2m
PV (7)
€2m
DON (6)
€2m
LIN (4)
€2m
STE (6)
€2m
BUR (4)
€1m
PET (5)
€1m
BRA (3)
€1m
ROT (5)
€1m
AW (5)
€1m
EXE (5)
€1m
NOR (3)
€1m
Reading's midfield is €2m more valuable than AFC Wimbledon's (€3m vs €1m).
🛡️ Defence
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
LUT (10)
€12m
CAR (10)
€10m
BOL (12)
€9m
HUD (13)
€8m
LIN (13)
€6m
PLY (11)
€6m
WYC (12)
€5m
BLA (9)
€4m
STO (11)
€4m
REA (9)
€4m
BAR (9)
€3m
PV (11)
€3m
LO (9)
€3m
STE (9)
€3m
DON (11)
€3m
PET (10)
€3m
BRA (9)
€3m
WIG (5)
€3m
AW (8)
€2m
BUR (7)
€2m
MAN (12)
€2m
NOR (10)
€2m
ROT (8)
€2m
EXE (5)
€1m
Reading's defence is €2m more valuable than AFC Wimbledon's (€4m vs €2m).
England: League One 2025/26 full table · click any column header to sort (click again to reverse). In-cell bars are scaled within each column; scroll right for props, squad value and strengths. Highlighted teams are this fixture's sides. Full England: League One stats & trends →
PythiaFootballBETA
Lincoln
Cardiff
Bolton
Stockport
Bradford
Stevenage
Luton
Plymouth
Huddersfield
Mansfield
Wycombe
Blackpool
Doncaster
Barnsley
Wigan
Burton
Peterboro
Leyton Orient
Exeter
Port Vale
Rotherham
Northampton