This opponent (Wycombe) is Stronger. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Wycombe
Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
3.1
Avg scored
1.8
Avg conceded
1.3
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
1.60
1.17
1.59
1.24
1.62
1.08
vs Stronger (3)
1.33
2.67
2.00
3.50
0.00
1.00
vs Similar (13)
1.31
0.62
1.00
0.83
1.57
0.43
vs Weaker (14)
1.93
1.36
1.89
1.00
2.00
2.00
Clean sheet %
47% (+19pp vs league)
This opponent (Cambridge) is Weaker. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Total goals distribution
The model estimates around 2.2 goals in this match; the single most likely total is 2 (28%).
Over/Under 1.5Actual: Over
Over 1.5
64.8%
Under 1.5
35.2%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Over/Under 2.5Actual: Over
Over 2.5
36.5%
@ 1.92-12.7%
Under 2.5
63.5%
@ 1.86+12.7%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Over/Under 3.5Actual: Over
Over 3.5
17.2%
Under 3.5
82.8%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Both teams to scoreActual: Yes
Yes
44.4%
No
55.6%
Best 5 market prices
Yes
No market prices yet.
No
No market prices yet.
Correct score
Top 8 scorelines with probability, best odds and edge (left); the full probability grid (right).
1-1
14.6%
0-0
12.9%
0-1
12.4%
1-0
9.9%
0-2
8.2%
1-2
7.9%
2-1
6.4%
2-0
5.4%
Cambridge goals ↓
Wycombe goals →
0
1
2
3
4
0
13%
12%
8.2%
3.2%
1.0%
1
9.9%
15%
7.9%
3.1%
0.9%
2
5.4%
6.4%
3.8%
1.5%
0.5%
3
1.7%
2.1%
1.2%
0.5%
0.1%
4
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
Each cell is the % chance of that exact scoreline. Rows = Cambridge goals (down), columns = Wycombe goals (across).
💪 3. Team Strengths Analysis
🏆 Total PPG
Points / game
Wigan
2.00
Rotherham
1.96
Milton Keynes Dons
1.93
Sheffield Weds
1.85
Sunderland
1.83
Wycombe
1.80
Plymouth
1.74
Oxford
1.65
Portsmouth
1.59
Bolton
1.59
Ipswich
1.52
Accrington
1.33
Charlton
1.28
Cambridge
1.26
Cheltenham
1.22
Burton
1.15
Lincoln
1.13
Shrewsbury
1.09
Morecambe
0.91
Gillingham
0.87
Fleetwood Town
0.87
Doncaster
0.83
AFC Wimbledon
0.80
Crewe
0.63
Cambridge is 0.54 points worse than Wycombe in terms of average points per game (1.26 vs 1.80).
⚔️ Attack
Goals scored / game
Oxford
1.78
Wigan
1.78
Sunderland
1.72
Sheffield Weds
1.70
Milton Keynes Dons
1.70
Wycombe
1.63
Bolton
1.61
Rotherham
1.52
Portsmouth
1.48
Plymouth
1.48
Ipswich
1.46
Cheltenham
1.43
Fleetwood Town
1.35
Accrington
1.33
Morecambe
1.24
Cambridge
1.22
Lincoln
1.20
Charlton
1.20
Burton
1.11
AFC Wimbledon
1.07
Shrewsbury
1.02
Crewe
0.80
Doncaster
0.80
Gillingham
0.76
Cambridge is 0.41 goals worse than Wycombe in terms of goals scored per game (1.22 vs 1.63).
🛡️ Defense
Conceded / game · lower better
Rotherham
0.72
Wigan
0.96
Milton Keynes Dons
0.96
Ipswich
1.00
Plymouth
1.04
Sheffield Weds
1.09
Portsmouth
1.11
Shrewsbury
1.11
Wycombe
1.11
Sunderland
1.15
Bolton
1.24
Oxford
1.28
Charlton
1.28
Lincoln
1.37
Burton
1.46
Gillingham
1.50
Cambridge
1.61
AFC Wimbledon
1.63
Accrington
1.74
Cheltenham
1.74
Doncaster
1.78
Fleetwood Town
1.78
Crewe
1.80
Morecambe
1.91
Cambridge is 0.50 goals worse than Wycombe in terms of goals conceded per game (1.61 vs 1.11).
⏱️ Possession
Avg possession %
Ipswich
59%
Milton Keynes Dons
59%
Bolton
57%
Sunderland
56%
Oxford
55%
Wigan
55%
Sheffield Weds
54%
Lincoln
53%
Plymouth
52%
Portsmouth
52%
Crewe
52%
Rotherham
51%
Charlton
50%
Accrington
50%
Cheltenham
48%
AFC Wimbledon
47%
Fleetwood Town
47%
Burton
46%
Wycombe
45%
Doncaster
45%
Cambridge
44%
Morecambe
43%
Shrewsbury
43%
Gillingham
38%
Cambridge is 0.9 percentage points worse than Wycombe in terms of average possession (44% vs 45%).
🎲 4. Props Analysis
Cambridge
For 3.3 · Against 7.0 · Total 10.3
🚩 Corners
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 1.4 · Against 1.9 · Total 3.3
🟨 Cards
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 8.1 · Against 11.2 · Total 19.3
⚠️ Fouls
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
Wycombe
For 3.9 · Against 3.7 · Total 7.6
🚩 Corners
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 1.5 · Against 2.1 · Total 3.6
🟨 Cards
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
For 14.6 · Against 10.6 · Total 25.2
⚠️ Fouls
ForAgainstTotal per gameAverage total
Cambridge
Split
Corners
Cards
Fouls
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Overall (50)
9.8
10.1
9.6
3.5
3.2
3.7
21.7
22.4
21.2
vs Stronger (15)
10.9
11.7
10.1
4.3
3.6
4.9
19.3
20.0
18.6
vs Similar (31)
9.4
9.5
9.3
2.9
2.9
3.0
22.2
22.7
21.6
vs Weaker (4)
9.0
8.5
9.5
4.5
5.0
4.0
27.8
28.0
27.5
% over line
48%
50%
46%
38%
38%
38%
50%
58%
42%
% under line
52%
50%
54%
62%
62%
62%
50%
42%
58%
This opponent (Wycombe) is Stronger. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Wycombe
Split
Corners
Cards
Fouls
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Tot
Hme
Awy
Overall (50)
9.5
9.6
9.4
3.5
3.1
3.9
23.9
23.2
24.7
vs Stronger (7)
8.9
10.7
7.5
2.6
3.0
2.2
22.6
22.7
22.5
vs Similar (24)
10.2
10.6
9.8
4.0
3.4
4.5
24.9
24.2
25.6
vs Weaker (19)
8.9
8.3
9.8
3.2
2.7
3.9
23.2
22.3
24.5
% over line
42%
38%
46%
52%
42%
62%
70%
65%
75%
% under line
58%
62%
54%
48%
58%
38%
30%
35%
25%
This opponent (Cambridge) is Weaker. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
🚩 Total Corners
Match total corners / game
Burton
11.9
Sunderland
10.9
Lincoln
10.8
Morecambe
10.8
Accrington
10.8
Sheffield Weds
10.7
Oxford
10.5
Plymouth
10.4
Shrewsbury
10.3
Rotherham
10.3
Bolton
10.2
Ipswich
10.2
Doncaster
10.1
Crewe
10.1
Portsmouth
10.0
Gillingham
10.0
AFC Wimbledon
10.0
Fleetwood Town
9.9
Cambridge
9.8
Milton Keynes Dons
9.8
Charlton
9.8
Wycombe
9.5
Cheltenham
9.5
Wigan
9.5
🟨 Total Cards
Match total cards / game
Charlton
4.3
Sunderland
4.0
Lincoln
4.0
Accrington
3.9
Wigan
3.8
AFC Wimbledon
3.8
Oxford
3.7
Portsmouth
3.7
Crewe
3.5
Milton Keynes Dons
3.5
Wycombe
3.5
Cambridge
3.5
Ipswich
3.4
Rotherham
3.3
Fleetwood Town
3.3
Gillingham
3.3
Bolton
3.3
Shrewsbury
3.3
Sheffield Weds
3.2
Plymouth
3.2
Cheltenham
3.1
Burton
3.1
Doncaster
3.0
Morecambe
2.7
⚠️ Total Fouls
Match total fouls / game
Wigan
25.0
Accrington
24.8
Portsmouth
24.7
Charlton
24.4
Rotherham
24.3
Sunderland
24.1
Wycombe
23.9
Lincoln
23.3
Milton Keynes Dons
23.0
Crewe
22.9
Fleetwood Town
22.8
Bolton
22.4
AFC Wimbledon
22.1
Gillingham
22.0
Oxford
21.9
Cambridge
21.7
Sheffield Weds
21.5
Shrewsbury
21.5
Burton
21.5
Ipswich
21.4
Doncaster
20.7
Plymouth
20.5
Cheltenham
20.2
Morecambe
20.0
Corners O/U 9.5Actual: Under
Over 9.5
56.1%
Under 9.5
43.9%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cards O/U 3.5Actual: Under
Over 3.5
18.4%
Under 3.5
81.6%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Fouls O/U 21.5Actual: Under
Over 21.5
16.5%
Under 21.5
83.5%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🔀 5. Double Chance
Double Chance
Two of the three results in one selection. The probability is the sum of those outcomes from the model above, so any edge here is the market pricing the combination out of line with its own 1X2.
🥅 6. Home & Away Over/Under
⚖️ 7. Handicap
⏱️ 8. Half Time Goals O/U
Cambridge
Half Time · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.2
Avg scored
0.4
Avg conceded
0.8
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.43
0.67
0.62
0.31
0.29
0.94
vs Stronger (11)
0.55
1.18
1.00
0.80
0.17
1.50
vs Similar (18)
0.33
0.39
0.38
0.00
0.30
0.70
vs Weaker (1)
1.00
0.00
-
-
1.00
0.00
Clean sheet %
63% (+35pp vs league)
This opponent (Wycombe) is Stronger. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Wycombe
Half Time · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.3
Avg scored
1.0
Avg conceded
0.3
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.90
0.40
0.94
0.35
0.85
0.46
vs Stronger (3)
1.00
1.33
1.50
1.50
0.00
1.00
vs Similar (13)
0.62
0.23
0.50
0.17
0.71
0.29
vs Weaker (14)
1.14
0.36
1.11
0.22
1.20
0.60
Clean sheet %
63% (+35pp vs league)
This opponent (Cambridge) is Weaker. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Half Time Over/Under 0.5Actual: Over
Over 0.5
0.0%
Under 0.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Half Time Over/Under 1.5Actual: Under
Over 1.5
0.0%
Under 1.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Half Time Over/Under 2.5Actual: Under
Over 2.5
0.0%
Under 2.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🥅 9. Half Time Home & Away O/U
How many goals each side scores in the first half on its own. Each line is modelled directly from that team's half-time goals rather than read off a scoreline grid, so unlike the full-time version the two sides need not sum exactly to the half-time match total.
Cambridge over/under 0.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cambridge over/under 1.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cambridge over/under 2.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 0.5 HTActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 1.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 2.5 HTActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
⏱️ 10. Second Half Goals O/U
Cambridge
Second Half · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.4
Avg scored
0.6
Avg conceded
0.8
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.70
0.77
0.54
0.46
0.82
1.00
vs Stronger (11)
0.27
0.82
0.20
0.20
0.33
1.33
vs Similar (18)
0.94
0.78
0.75
0.62
1.10
0.90
vs Weaker (1)
1.00
0.00
-
-
1.00
0.00
Clean sheet %
43% (+15pp vs league)
This opponent (Wycombe) is Stronger. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Wycombe
Second Half · Last 10 – goals for & against
Avg total
1.8
Avg scored
0.8
Avg conceded
1.0
Split
Total Scored
Total Conceded
Home Scored
Home Conceded
Away Scored
Away Conceded
Avg goals/game
0.70
0.77
0.65
0.88
0.77
0.62
vs Stronger (3)
0.33
1.33
0.50
2.00
0.00
0.00
vs Similar (13)
0.69
0.38
0.50
0.67
0.86
0.14
vs Weaker (14)
0.79
1.00
0.78
0.78
0.80
1.40
Clean sheet %
57% (+29pp vs league)
This opponent (Cambridge) is Weaker. The matching ‘vs’ row is the one to weigh.
Second Half Over/Under 0.5Actual: Over
Over 0.5
0.0%
Under 0.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Second Half Over/Under 1.5Actual: Over
Over 1.5
0.0%
Under 1.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Second Half Over/Under 2.5Actual: Over
Over 2.5
0.0%
Under 2.5
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🥅 11. Second Half Home & Away O/U
How many goals each side scores in the second half on its own. Each line is modelled directly from that team's second-half goals rather than read off a scoreline grid, so unlike the full-time version the two sides need not sum exactly to the second-half match total.
Cambridge over/under 0.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cambridge over/under 1.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Cambridge over/under 2.5 2HActual: Under
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 0.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 1.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
Wycombe over/under 2.5 2HActual: Over
Over
0.0%
Under
0.0%
Best 5 market prices
Over
No market prices yet.
Under
No market prices yet.
🔥 12. Top picks for this game
Every selection Pythia rates above 70%, ordered by probability. Use Min odds to match the prices you want: slide down for near-certainties at short prices, up for longer prices. Unpriced picks are ranked on the model's fair odds. Edge defaults to Yes, showing only selections priced BELOW what the model makes them; switch to All to include the rest, and picks we hold no price for. The five columns are the best market prices (highest first) for each pick; edge is vs the average. Result grades each pick against the final score.
Min odds1.20
Edge
Pick
Probability
Avg odds
Best 1
Best 2
Best 3
Best 4
Best 5
Edge
Result
Under 5.5 cards
97.4%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 25.5 fouls
96.7%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 4.5 cards
92.6%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 23.5 fouls
92.1%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 21.5 fouls
83.5%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
Under 3.5
82.8%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✗ Miss
Under 3.5 cards
81.6%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
✓ Hit
No picks at these odds - lower the slider to see shorter-priced selections.
🎽 13. Player market rates
Cambridge · 2026/27
Anytime goalscorer
Matches in which the player scored
B. Knight75%
Isaac Heath25%
Sullay Kaikai20%
Z. Bradshaw20%
P. Mpanzu0%
Dominic Ball0%
Louis Appéré0%
S. Lavery0%
K. Watts0%
J. Eastwood0%
G. Yahyai0%
Liam Bennett0%
G. McConnell0%
Callum Perry0%
To be booked (yellow)
Matches in which the player was booked
G. McConnell33%
Dominic Ball20%
S. Lavery20%
K. Watts20%
J. Eastwood20%
Liam Bennett20%
Z. Bradshaw20%
P. Mpanzu0%
Sullay Kaikai0%
Louis Appéré0%
B. Knight0%
G. Yahyai0%
Isaac Heath0%
Callum Perry0%
Anytime assist
Matches in which the player assisted
Louis Appéré40%
G. McConnell33%
Sullay Kaikai20%
P. Mpanzu0%
Dominic Ball0%
S. Lavery0%
K. Watts0%
J. Eastwood0%
B. Knight0%
G. Yahyai0%
Liam Bennett0%
Isaac Heath0%
Z. Bradshaw0%
Callum Perry0%
Over 2.5 shots
Matches with 3+ shots taken
B. Knight50%
Isaac Heath25%
Sullay Kaikai20%
P. Mpanzu0%
Dominic Ball0%
Louis Appéré0%
S. Lavery0%
K. Watts0%
J. Eastwood0%
G. Yahyai0%
Liam Bennett0%
G. McConnell0%
Z. Bradshaw0%
Callum Perry0%
Wycombe · 2026/27
Anytime goalscorer
Matches in which the player scored
C. Woodrow50%
Ewan Henderson25%
C. Taylor25%
Steve Cook0%
J. Scowen0%
Fred Onyedinma0%
J. Grimmer0%
A. Morley0%
D. Harvie0%
Conor Hazard0%
Junior Quitirna0%
C. Boyd-Munce0%
E. Tezgel0%
Silko Thomas0%
Samuel Parker0%
To be booked (yellow)
Matches in which the player was booked
Ewan Henderson75%
Fred Onyedinma25%
Steve Cook0%
J. Scowen0%
C. Woodrow0%
J. Grimmer0%
A. Morley0%
D. Harvie0%
Conor Hazard0%
Junior Quitirna0%
C. Boyd-Munce0%
E. Tezgel0%
Silko Thomas0%
C. Taylor0%
Samuel Parker0%
Anytime assist
Matches in which the player assisted
Ewan Henderson25%
Silko Thomas25%
Steve Cook0%
J. Scowen0%
Fred Onyedinma0%
C. Woodrow0%
J. Grimmer0%
A. Morley0%
D. Harvie0%
Conor Hazard0%
Junior Quitirna0%
C. Boyd-Munce0%
E. Tezgel0%
C. Taylor0%
Samuel Parker0%
Over 2.5 shots
Matches with 3+ shots taken
Ewan Henderson25%
D. Harvie25%
Steve Cook0%
J. Scowen0%
Fred Onyedinma0%
C. Woodrow0%
J. Grimmer0%
A. Morley0%
Conor Hazard0%
Junior Quitirna0%
C. Boyd-Munce0%
E. Tezgel0%
Silko Thomas0%
C. Taylor0%
Samuel Parker0%
Players with at least 3 appearances, top 10 per market – scroll each card for the rest. These are shares of matches played, which is how these markets settle, not per-90 rates.
💰 14. Squad value
💰 Total value
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
SUN (30)
€392m
IPS (31)
€280m
POR (30)
€32m
CHA (29)
€31m
SHW (24)
€21m
OXF (24)
€20m
BOL (22)
€17m
MKD (24)
€15m
PLY (25)
€13m
LIN (24)
€12m
WYC (24)
€10m
WIG (21)
€7m
DON (23)
€7m
AW (21)
€5m
CAM (20)
€5m
BUR (17)
€5m
ROT (19)
€5m
CRE (20)
€4m
SHR (17)
€3m
GIL (16)
€3m
CHE (19)
€3m
FT (18)
€3m
ACC (18)
€2m
MOR (1)
€0m
Cambridge's squad is €5m less valuable than Wycombe's (€5m vs €10m).
⚔️ Attack
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
SUN (9)
€157m
IPS (11)
€130m
CHA (13)
€18m
POR (12)
€13m
SHW (6)
€7m
OXF (8)
€6m
MKD (8)
€5m
PLY (8)
€4m
BOL (6)
€4m
LIN (7)
€3m
WYC (7)
€3m
AW (8)
€2m
CAM (9)
€2m
WIG (8)
€2m
ROT (6)
€2m
CRE (6)
€2m
DON (6)
€2m
BUR (6)
€1m
CHE (5)
€1m
GIL (4)
€1m
ACC (7)
€1m
FT (6)
€1m
SHR (3)
€0m
MOR (0)
€0m
Cambridge and Wycombe have a similar attack value (both €2m).
🧠 Midfield
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
SUN (6)
€110m
IPS (7)
€66m
MKD (6)
€7m
SHW (5)
€6m
OXF (4)
€6m
POR (5)
€5m
BOL (4)
€4m
CHA (3)
€3m
PLY (6)
€3m
WIG (8)
€2m
WYC (5)
€2m
DON (6)
€2m
LIN (4)
€2m
GIL (8)
€2m
BUR (4)
€1m
SHR (4)
€1m
CHE (6)
€1m
CRE (7)
€1m
FT (4)
€1m
ROT (5)
€1m
AW (5)
€1m
CAM (3)
€1m
ACC (5)
€1m
MOR (1)
€0m
Cambridge's midfield is €2m less valuable than Wycombe's (€1m vs €2m).
🛡️ Defence
Squad value (€m) · (players with data)
SUN (15)
€125m
IPS (13)
€85m
POR (13)
€14m
CHA (13)
€10m
BOL (12)
€9m
OXF (12)
€8m
SHW (13)
€8m
LIN (13)
€6m
PLY (11)
€6m
WYC (12)
€5m
DON (11)
€3m
MKD (10)
€3m
WIG (5)
€3m
CAM (8)
€2m
AW (8)
€2m
BUR (7)
€2m
ROT (8)
€2m
SHR (10)
€2m
CRE (7)
€1m
FT (8)
€1m
ACC (6)
€1m
CHE (8)
€1m
GIL (4)
€1m
MOR (0)
€0m
Cambridge's defence is €3m less valuable than Wycombe's (€2m vs €5m).
England: League One 2021/22 full table · click any column header to sort (click again to reverse). In-cell bars are scaled within each column; scroll right for props, squad value and strengths. Highlighted teams are this fixture's sides. Full England: League One stats & trends →
PythiaFootballBETA
Wigan
Rotherham
Milton Keynes Dons
Sheffield Weds
Sunderland
Plymouth
Oxford
Bolton
Portsmouth
Ipswich
Accrington
Charlton
Cheltenham
Burton
Lincoln
Shrewsbury
Morecambe
Fleetwood Town
Gillingham
Doncaster
AFC Wimbledon
Crewe