

Petrocub is the clear favourite to win at home, with a 62% chance of success, according to the model. This is largely due to the home side's strong record against weaker opponents, having scored an average of 2.67 goals and conceded just 0.33 goals at home. In contrast, Politehnica UTM has struggled away from home, particularly against stronger opponents, scoring an average of just 1 goal and conceding 2.
The model predicts a 22% chance of 3 goals being scored, with the most likely score being 1-1, although this is only a 9.9% probability. The expected total number of goals is 3.3.
In terms of the match result, the model's selection is a home win, with a 62% chance of success. The draw is a 22% possibility, while the away win is a 17% chance. The home side's home win percentage is 62%, the draw percentage is 22%, and the away win percentage is 17%.
The model also suggests taking Over 1.5, which has an 84.6% probability of occurring, with a 3% edge.
Petrocub's win extends their 2-game winning run, with the latest victory coming at the expense of Politehnica UTM. The final score was 3-1, confirming the actual result of a home win. The model's selection, a home win, was correct, given its pre-match probability of 62%. The model's call was a resounding success, as the selections largely came in. The model's selection of a home win was correct. The model's selection of Over 1.5 goals hit, with a probability of 84.6%, while the most likely total goals was 3, with a probability of 22%.
Petrocub| Split | Total Scored | Total Conceded | Home Scored | Home Conceded | Away Scored | Away Conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg goals/game | 2.17 | 0.57 | 2.62 | 0.62 | 1.82 | 0.53 |
| vs Stronger (0) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| vs Similar (9) | 1.33 | 1.11 | 2.50 | 1.25 | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| vs Weaker (21) | 2.52 | 0.33 | 2.67 | 0.33 | 2.42 | 0.33 |
| Clean sheet % | 57% (+25pp vs league) | |||||
Politehnica UTM| Split | Total Scored | Total Conceded | Home Scored | Home Conceded | Away Scored | Away Conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg goals/game | 1.60 | 2.00 | 1.73 | 1.60 | 1.47 | 2.40 |
| vs Stronger (20) | 1.30 | 2.30 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.10 | 2.60 |
| vs Similar (10) | 2.20 | 1.40 | 2.20 | 0.80 | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| vs Weaker (0) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clean sheet % | 13% (-18pp vs league) | |||||
| Politehnica UTM goals → | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 0 | 4.7% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| 1 | 7.5% | 9.9% | 4.9% | 1.7% | 0.5% |
| 2 | 9.1% | 9.9% | 5.3% | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| 3 | 6.7% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 1.4% | 0.4% |
| 4 | 3.6% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1.5 | 84.6% | 1.13 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.10 | - | - | +3.1% | ✓ Hit |
| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/10/25 | H | 4-1 | |
| 23/08/25 | A | 0-5 | |
| 05/07/25 | H | 2-1 |
Petrocub| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/07/26 | A | 0-0 | |
| 19/07/26 | H | 2-3 | |
| 11/07/26 | A | 1-1 | |
| 04/07/26 | H | 5-0 | |
| 17/05/26 | A | 1-1 | |
| 10/05/26 | H | 3-0 | |
| 02/05/26 | A | 0-3 | |
| 26/04/26 | H | 1-0 | |
| 18/04/26 | A | 1-2 | |
| 11/04/26 | H | 3-0 |
Politehnica UTM| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/07/26 | H | 0-2 | |
| 18/07/26 | A | 1-5 | |
| 11/07/26 | A | 1-2 | |
| 04/07/26 | H | 0-0 | |
| 09/05/26 | A | 1-1 | |
| 04/05/26 | H | 2-0 | |
| 01/05/26 | A | 0-2 | |
| 24/04/26 | H | 3-1 | |
| 17/04/26 | H | 5-1 | |
| 11/04/26 | H | 2-0 |
| Record | Goals | Props / game | Squad value €m | Strengths | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | MP | Pts | Win% | PPG | GF | GA | GD | G/G | O1.5 | O2.5 | O3.5 | Cor | Cor O% | Crd | Crd O% | Fls | Fls O% | Tot | Att | Mid | Def | Att/g | Def/g | Poss% |
| 1 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 7 | 15 | 57% | 2.1 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 2.9 | 57% | 43% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2.0 | 0.9 | - |
| 2 | Zimbru | 7 | 13 | 57% | 1.9 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 3.7 | 100% | 71% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | - |
| 3 | Dacia-Buiucani | 7 | 12 | 57% | 1.7 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 3.3 | 71% | 71% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | - |
| 4 | Politehnica UTM | 7 | 11 | 43% | 1.6 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 3.3 | 86% | 57% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 | 1.1 | - |
| 5 | Petrocub | 7 | 11 | 43% | 1.6 | 14 | 8 | +6 | 3.1 | 86% | 71% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1.1 | - |
| 6 | Milsami Orhei | 7 | 6 | 14% | 0.9 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3.0 | 71% | 57% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - |
| 7 | Sireți | 7 | 5 | 0% | 0.7 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 2.3 | 86% | 43% | 14% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | - |
| 8 | CSF Bălți | 7 | 2 | 0% | 0.3 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3.9 | 100% | 71% | 43% | - | 0% | - | 0% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 3.1 | - |