Amine Et-Taibi Stats, Market Value & Form

Summary

Amine Et-Taibi has already shown a defensive intensity that far exceeds the average for his position in the Eredivisie. In his first appearance of the 2026/27 season, he logged 22 minutes and recorded one tackle, translating to a tackles-per-90 rate of 4.09 compared to the baseline of 1.65 for defenders. Although he has not yet contributed to the attack with a goal, assist, or shot, his defensive work rate is evident from the statistics available. The single appearance also reflects a season so far, with no key passes or interceptions recorded yet. Et-Taibi’s average match rating of 6.5 places him solidly within the expected range for a defender, and his defensive output suggests he is already a key component of the team's work off the ball.

Amine Et-Taibi has played 31 minutes across 2 appearances in Eredivisie, at 0.00 goals per 90 against a positional baseline of 0.06 and averaging 6.60 a match.

Written by Pythia from this player's own numbers.

Tackles per match

Total

Per match

1.10

Interceptions per match

Total

Per match

1.00

Duels won per match

Dotted line: duels won %

Total

Win rate

37%

Blocks per match

Total

Per match

0.40

Pass accuracy per match

Dotted line: accuracy %

Completed

254

Accuracy

78%

Fouls per match

Total

Per match

0.90

Dribbled past per match

Total

Per match

1.00

Saves per match

Total

Per match

0.00

Save rate

Per 90 against his positional baseline

Tackles /90		2.90 1.66 1.60
Interceptions /90		0.00 1.12 0.89
Duels won /90		2.90 4.85 4.75
Blocks /90		0.00 0.66 0.40
Passes /90		23.23 49.76 40.68
Fouls /90		0.00 0.98 1.09

Black tick is the positional baseline: the average defender in Eredivisie with 900+ minutes (158 players). Amber is the league average across every outfield position, which is what shows a defender out-passing most midfielders. Green means better for that metric, which for fouls and goals conceded means fewer.

Shape

Solid is the player, dashed ring is the positional baseline.

Player	Pos	Apps	Mins	Goals	Assists	Shots	On tgt	Goals /shot	Key passes	Pass acc	Dribbles	Drib %	Tackles	Interc.	Blocks	Duels won %	Fouls	Fouled	Yel	Saves	Rating	Form
Devin Haen	F	3	270	2	0	6	3	33%	4	66%	2	67%	1	1	0	57%	4	2	0	0	7.57	–
Uriel van Aalst	F	3	270	1	0	4	1	25%	1	59%	3	60%	2	1	2	43%	1	1	0	0	6.63	–
Thomas Verheydt	F	2	24	1	0	1	1	100%	0	38%	0	–	1	0	0	78%	0	1	0	0	7.90	–
Finn Stam	D	3	270	0	0	0	0	–	0	77%	0	0%	3	6	2	60%	1	0	0	0	6.53	–
Jaden Slory	M	3	269	0	0	4	3	0%	4	78%	2	29%	3	0	0	37%	2	7	0	0	6.37	–
Kasper Boogaard	M	3	265	0	0	3	0	0%	1	70%	0	0%	8	2	1	48%	6	2	0	0	6.43	–
Nathan Tjoe-A-On	D	3	244	0	2	3	0	0%	5	81%	1	20%	5	7	1	45%	5	0	1	0	6.37	–
Justin Hoogma	D	3	225	0	0	0	0	–	0	83%	0	–	1	1	2	38%	2	1	0	0	6.23	–
Eser Gürbüz	M	3	207	0	0	1	0	0%	2	80%	3	30%	2	2	0	39%	4	4	0	0	6.40	–
Per van Loon	D	3	186	0	0	0	0	–	2	85%	2	100%	6	3	1	50%	4	0	0	0	6.23	–
Karst de Leeuw	G	2	180	0	0	0	0	–	0	51%	0	–	0	0	0	0%	0	0	0	9	7.50	–
Alessandro Ciranni	M	3	168	0	0	0	0	–	0	67%	0	–	1	3	0	46%	2	2	0	0	6.50	–
Hidde ter Avest	D	2	111	0	1	1	0	0%	1	68%	0	–	5	0	0	78%	0	0	0	0	7.05	–
Calvin Twigt	M	1	85	0	1	0	0	–	5	79%	0	–	2	3	0	57%	0	2	0	0	7.50	–
Mats Lemmens	D	3	80	0	0	0	0	–	0	82%	0	0%	1	1	1	60%	0	0	0	0	6.63	–
Thomas Didillon	G	1	68	0	0	0	0	–	0	52%	0	–	0	0	0	–	0	0	0	3	6.90	–
Amine Et-Taibi	D	2	31	0	0	0	0	–	0	75%	0	0%	1	0	0	33%	0	0	0	0	6.60	–
Wouter Van der Steen	G	1	22	0	0	0	0	–	0	50%	0	–	0	0	0	–	0	0	0	3	6.70	–
Julian van Esdonk	M	1	1	0	0	0	0	–	0	–	0	–	0	0	0	–	0	0	0	0	–	–
Ismael Mouhoul	M	1	1	0	0	0	0	–	0	–	0	–	0	0	0	0%	2	0	1	0	–	–
Divano Fernandez Iglesias	M	1	1	0	0	0	0	–	0	100%	0	–	0	0	0	–	0	0	0	0	–	–

Per-player totals for 2026/27 from API-Football match stats, across 21 players. Click any column to sort. Goals/shot is conversion - goals divided by shots taken. Rating is API-Football's own 0-10 composite for each appearance, averaged here; it is their proprietary score, so treat it as a summary rather than an input. A blank from the provider means the player recorded none of that event, so it counts as zero. Form is 0-10: each appearance is scored as a per-90 composite of the stats that matter for that position, then the last 5 are compared with the player's own season baseline. 5 is their normal, green a hot run, red a cold one – it measures a player against themselves, not against the squad. Under 6 appearances shows a dash rather than a number off too small a sample.

Season	Club	Comp	Apps	Mins	Goals	Assists	Shots	On tgt	Goals /shot	Key passes	Pass acc	Dribbles	Tackles	Interc.	Duels won %	Fouls	Yel	Rating
2026/27	Willem II	Eredivisie	2	31	0	0	0	0	–	0	75%	0	1	0	33%	0	0	6.60
2025/26	Helmond Sport	Eerste Divisie	19	1614	1	1	12	6	8%	14	78%	7	43	16	60%	21	2	6.89
2025/26	Willem II	Eerste Divisie	8	622	0	2	3	1	0%	9	78%	5	10	10	37%	9	0	6.89
2025/26	Helmond Sport	KNVB Beker	1	60	0	0	0	0	–	1	83%	0	0	0	17%	0	0	6.00
2024/25	Club Brugge II	Challenger Pro League	16	1236	0	1	4	1	0%	2	91%	0	13	12	52%	12	2	6.85
2024/25	Club Brugge KV	Jupiler Pro League	0	0	0	0	0	0	–	0	–	0	0	0	–	0	0	–
2023/24	Club Brugge II	Challenger Pro League	24	2034	3	2	10	5	30%	10	87%	8	38	20	52%	21	2	7.03

Date	Opponent	Res	Mins	Goals	Assists	Shots	On tgt	Key passes	Tackles	Fouls	Yel	Rating	Form
30 Aug	v Heerenveen	D	9	–	0	0	–	0	0	–	0	6.70	–
08 Aug	a GO Ahead Eagles	L	22	–	0	0	–	0	1	–	0	6.50	–
08 Mar	v Den Bosch	D	25	–	0	0	–	0	0	–	0	7.00	–
27 Feb	a Emmen	W	90	–	0	2	1	2	2	–	0	8.00	–
24 Feb	v ADO Den Haag	L	90	–	0	0	–	0	2	1	0	6.50	–
20 Feb	v Vitesse	W	90	–	1	0	–	1	0	1	0	7.50	–
16 Feb	a Jong Utrecht	D	75	–	0	0	–	1	0	1	0	6.20	–
08 Feb	v Waalwijk	W	90	–	0	1	–	2	1	2	0	6.70	–
02 Feb	a Jong Ajax	L	87	–	0	0	–	1	2	3	0	5.90	–
23 Jan	v VVV Venlo	W	75	–	1	0	–	2	3	1	0	7.30	–
16 Jan	v Vitesse	D	90	–	0	1	1	0	3	4	1	6.50	–
21 Dec	v Willem II	D	90	1	1	3	3	1	2	4	1	8.20	–
12 Dec	a Emmen	L	78	–	0	1	1	1	1	–	0	6.20	–
28 Nov	a Cambuur	D	86	–	0	0	–	3	3	–	0	7.90	–
24 Nov	v Jong Ajax	W	90	–	0	0	–	1	0	–	0	7.00	–

Amine Et-Taibi

A Pro feature