Nathan Fraser Stats, Market Value & Form

Summary

Nathan Fraser’s 2024/25 campaign in the Challenger Pro League saw him make four appearances, covering 41 minutes in total. He recorded no goals or assists but contributed to the attack with three shots, two of which were on target, giving him a shots-per-90 rate of 6.59, well above the forward baseline of 1.79. Fraser’s key-pass output was nil, below the expected 1.22 for his position. Defensively, he made one interception and recorded no tackles, a figure that falls short of the baseline 1.04 tackles per 90. His overall match rating averaged 6.48, reflecting a season where his offensive volume outpaced positional norms, yet his contribution to goal creation and defensive work remained limited.

Nathan Fraser has played 41 minutes across 4 appearances in Challenger Pro League, at 0.00 goals per 90 against a positional baseline of 0.33, converting 0% of 3 shots and averaging 6.48 a match.

Written by Pythia from this player's own numbers.

Per 90 against his positional baseline

Goals /90		0.00 0.33 0.13
Shots /90		6.59 1.79 0.89
Shots on target /90		4.39 0.94 0.43
Key passes /90		0.00 1.22 0.90
Dribbles /90		0.00 1.04 0.68
Fouls /90		8.78 1.43 1.27

Black tick is the positional baseline: the average forward in Challenger Pro League with 900+ minutes (33 players). Amber is the league average across every outfield position, which is what shows a defender out-passing most midfielders. Green means better for that metric, which for fouls and goals conceded means fewer.

Shape

Solid is the player, dashed ring is the positional baseline.

Player	Pos	Apps	Mins	Goals	Assists	Shots	On tgt	Goals /shot	Key passes	Pass acc	Dribbles	Drib %	Tackles	Interc.	Blocks	Duels won %	Fouls	Fouled	Yel	Red	Saves	Rating	Form
Jelle Vossen	F	24	1917	15	2	53	28	28%	23	73%	11	44%	9	2	3	48%	28	37	4	0	0	7.36	6.7
Stavros Gavriel	M	26	1927	7	6	36	20	19%	29	76%	32	48%	23	16	7	46%	14	30	2	0	0	7.16	7.7
Pape Diop	M	28	2470	6	5	53	21	11%	39	81%	21	57%	55	38	4	53%	32	32	7	0	0	7.45	3.3
Jeppe Erenbjerg	M	27	2112	6	5	26	17	23%	36	82%	26	41%	25	11	5	39%	13	26	3	0	0	7.02	2.8
Tobias Hedl	F	10	550	4	0	14	10	29%	7	66%	4	31%	6	3	0	38%	11	11	0	0	0	6.97	7.5
Matheus Machado Ferreira	F	6	89	4	0	8	7	50%	2	81%	2	40%	1	1	0	47%	1	4	0	0	0	7.47	6.5
Joseph Okopu	M	26	2067	3	7	32	15	9%	49	82%	45	52%	33	8	2	41%	29	28	3	0	0	7.10	6.5
Abdoulaye Traore	M	17	564	3	0	23	12	13%	5	76%	12	43%	12	1	0	43%	2	5	0	0	0	6.84	3.4
Benoit Nyssen	D	26	2215	2	8	16	7	12%	29	77%	23	59%	42	20	3	54%	20	20	3	0	0	7.08	0.8
Youssef Challouk	M	15	687	2	0	11	9	18%	19	77%	9	53%	5	3	1	39%	9	16	4	0	0	7.04	7.2
Nicolas Rommens	M	26	2317	1	5	16	7	6%	48	82%	7	58%	43	33	5	60%	31	28	10	0	0	7.26	5.8
Anton Tanghe	D	25	2236	1	1	6	2	17%	10	86%	0	0%	17	23	16	49%	17	9	3	0	0	6.99	2.2
Atli Barkarson	D	20	1623	1	2	9	3	11%	17	77%	3	43%	15	16	9	52%	13	3	1	0	0	6.93	2.4
Ennio Van Der Gouw	G	29	2610	0	0	0	0	–	2	78%	1	100%	0	0	0	80%	0	5	1	0	74	7.07	2.3
Lukas Willen	D	28	2403	0	1	7	3	0%	8	87%	14	67%	41	40	11	62%	19	19	4	0	0	6.99	3.8
Laurent Lemoine	D	17	1092	0	0	0	0	–	0	86%	3	43%	25	8	8	59%	10	12	3	1	0	6.85	5.3
Tochukwu Nnadi	M	23	793	0	0	2	1	0%	4	85%	9	69%	36	15	4	59%	28	23	4	0	0	6.81	3.7
Yannick Cappelle	D	10	694	0	0	1	1	0%	10	83%	11	58%	24	7	0	62%	5	11	0	0	0	7.08	2.8
Andres Labie	D	3	185	0	0	0	0	–	0	90%	0	–	3	5	2	47%	2	1	0	0	0	6.87	–
Wilguens Paugain	D	3	124	0	1	1	1	0%	3	76%	1	50%	6	0	0	67%	1	2	0	0	0	6.93	–
Alioune Ndour	F	3	42	0	0	0	0	–	0	82%	1	50%	1	0	0	50%	2	1	0	0	0	6.53	–
Nathan Fraser	F	4	41	0	0	3	2	0%	0	77%	0	–	0	1	0	15%	4	0	0	0	0	6.48	–
Jevon Simons	M	3	41	0	0	0	0	–	3	71%	0	0%	1	0	0	50%	0	1	0	0	0	6.77	–
Dylan Demuynck	M	2	18	0	0	0	0	–	0	20%	1	100%	0	0	0	33%	0	0	0	0	0	6.30	–
Siebe Van Keymolen	M	1	14	0	0	0	0	–	0	100%	0	–	1	0	0	50%	0	0	0	0	0	6.30	–

Per-player totals for 2024/25 from API-Football match stats, across 25 players. Click any column to sort. Goals/shot is conversion - goals divided by shots taken. Rating is API-Football's own 0-10 composite for each appearance, averaged here; it is their proprietary score, so treat it as a summary rather than an input. A blank from the provider means the player recorded none of that event, so it counts as zero. Form is 0-10: each appearance is scored as a per-90 composite of the stats that matter for that position, then the last 5 are compared with the player's own season baseline. 5 is their normal, green a hot run, red a cold one – it measures a player against themselves, not against the squad. Under 6 appearances shows a dash rather than a number off too small a sample.

Season	Club	Comp	Apps	Mins	Shots	On tgt	Goals /shot	Key passes	Pass acc	Tackles	Interc.	Duels won %	Fouls	Yel	Rating
2024/25	Zulte Waregem	Challenger Pro League	4	41	3	2	0%	0	77%	0	1	15%	4	0	6.48
2023/24	Wolves	Premier League	7	210	3	2	0%	2	79%	5	1	38%	5	1	6.61
2022/23	Wolves	Premier League	0	0	0	0	–	0	–	0	0	–	0	0	–

Date	Opponent	Res	Mins	Goals	Assists	Shots	On tgt	Key passes	Tackles	Fouls	Yel	Rating	Form
24 Nov	v Seraing United	W	13	–	0	1	1	0	0	–	0	6.70	–
06 Oct	v Club Brugge II	W	8	–	0	0	–	0	0	1	0	6.30	–
30 Aug	v Lokeren-Temse	W	10	–	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	6.30	–
25 Aug	a Deinze	D	10	–	0	1	–	0	0	2	0	6.60	–
24 Apr	v Bournemouth	–	10	–	–	0	–	0	0	–	0	6.30	–
13 Apr	a Nottingham Forest	–	9	–	–	0	–	0	1	1	0	6.70	–
30 Mar	a Aston Villa	–	16	–	–	1	–	0	1	1	0	6.60	–
09 Mar	v Fulham	–	77	–	–	1	1	1	2	1	0	6.60	–
02 Mar	a Newcastle	–	45	–	–	1	1	0	0	1	0	6.70	–
10 Feb	v Brentford	–	45	–	–	0	–	1	1	1	1	6.70	–
01 Feb	v Manchester United	–	8	–	–	0	–	0	0	–	0	6.70	–

Nathan FraserLast recorded season

A Pro feature