

This match between Yeovil and Solihull in the England National League is finely balanced, with Yeovil coming off a draw against Carlisle, while Solihull is looking to bounce back from two consecutive defeats. The model predicts a Home win, with a 37% chance, followed by a Draw at 30%, and an Away win at 33%.
The expected total number of goals is 2.5, with the most likely total being 2. The model suggests a 1-1 scoreline as the most likely outcome, with a probability of 14.1%.
At home, Yeovil scores an average of 1.21 goals and concedes 1.36, while away, Solihull scores 0.67 goals and concedes 1.33.
The model's selection for the match is a Home win, with a 37% chance. Other selections include Under 3.5 with a 75.9% chance and Over 1.5 with a 72.4% chance.
The probabilities for each outcome are: Home win 37%, Draw 30%, Away win 33%. The model's selections are: Home win 37%, Under 3.5 75.9%, and Over 1.5 72.4%.
In a stunning upset, Solihull secured a 1-4 away win over pre-match favourite Yeovil, marking a departure from their recent form which had seen them come off a draw. This result extends Yeovil's winless streak, while Solihull's victory follows two consecutive straight defeats. The model's selection, Home win, was incorrect, with a pre-match probability of 37%. The model's call was wrong. Meanwhile, the model's selection of Under 3.5 goals missed, with a probability of 75.9%, and Over 1.5 goals hit, with a probability of 72.4%.
Yeovil| Split | Total Scored | Total Conceded | Home Scored | Home Conceded | Away Scored | Away Conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg goals/game | 1.00 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 0.80 | 1.47 |
| vs Stronger (1) | 2.00 | 3.00 | - | - | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| vs Similar (26) | 1.00 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 1.36 | 0.75 | 1.33 |
| vs Weaker (3) | 0.67 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.50 |
| Clean sheet % | 23% (-3pp vs league) | |||||
Solihull| Split | Total Scored | Total Conceded | Home Scored | Home Conceded | Away Scored | Away Conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg goals/game | 1.67 | 1.50 | 2.20 | 1.67 | 1.13 | 1.33 |
| vs Stronger (2) | 2.50 | 1.50 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| vs Similar (20) | 1.35 | 1.80 | 1.91 | 2.18 | 0.67 | 1.33 |
| vs Weaker (8) | 2.25 | 0.75 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Clean sheet % | 27% (+1pp vs league) | |||||
| Solihull goals → | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 0 | 9.5% | 8.6% | 6.0% | 2.4% | 0.7% |
| 1 | 9.4% | 14% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 0.9% |
| 2 | 6.9% | 8.3% | 5.0% | 2.0% | 0.6% |
| 3 | 3.0% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| 4 | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 3.5 | 75.9% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ✗ Miss |
| Over 1.5 | 72.4% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ✓ Hit |
| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/25 | A | 0-1 | |
| 22/03/25 | A | 0-3 | |
| 10/09/24 | H | 0-1 | |
| 15/04/23 | A | 2-2 | |
| 08/10/22 | H | 1-0 | |
| 05/02/22 | H | 0-0 | |
| 30/10/21 | A | 0-0 | |
| 27/04/21 | H | 3-0 |
Yeovil| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/04/26 | A | 3-0 | |
| 11/04/26 | H | 0-0 | |
| 06/04/26 | A | 2-1 | |
| 03/04/26 | H | 1-0 | |
| 31/03/26 | A | 2-1 | |
| 28/03/26 | A | 2-1 | |
| 25/03/26 | A | 0-2 | |
| 21/03/26 | H | 3-2 | |
| 17/03/26 | A | 1-0 | |
| 14/03/26 | A | 2-1 |
Solihull| Date | H/A | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/04/26 | H | 0-3 | |
| 14/04/26 | A | 0-0 | |
| 11/04/26 | A | 0-0 | |
| 06/04/26 | H | 4-1 | |
| 03/04/26 | A | 1-0 | |
| 28/03/26 | H | 1-0 | |
| 25/03/26 | A | 1-1 | |
| 21/03/26 | H | 0-3 | |
| 17/03/26 | A | 1-1 | |
| 14/03/26 | A | 5-1 |
| Record | Goals | Props / game | Squad value €m | Strengths | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Team | MP | Pts | Win% | PPG | GF | GA | GD | G/G | O1.5 | O2.5 | O3.5 | Cor | Cor O% | Crd | Crd O% | Fls | Fls O% | Tot | Att | Mid | Def | Att/g | Def/g | Poss% |
| 1 | York | 46 | 108 | 72% | 2.3 | 114 | 41 | +73 | 3.4 | 87% | 72% | 50% | - | 0% | 3.9 | 52% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 62% |
| 2 | Rochdale | 46 | 106 | 72% | 2.3 | 88 | 41 | +47 | 2.8 | 80% | 59% | 28% | - | 0% | 3.1 | 48% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 56% |
| 3 | Carlisle | 46 | 95 | 63% | 2.1 | 87 | 51 | +36 | 3.0 | 83% | 61% | 30% | - | 0% | 3.6 | 52% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 49% |
| 4 | Boreham Wood | 46 | 90 | 59% | 2.0 | 95 | 58 | +37 | 3.3 | 89% | 72% | 39% | - | 0% | 3.2 | 43% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 58% |
| 5 | Scunthorpe | 46 | 82 | 50% | 1.8 | 79 | 63 | +16 | 3.1 | 87% | 61% | 35% | - | 0% | 4.1 | 63% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 49% |
| 6 | Southend | 46 | 81 | 50% | 1.8 | 83 | 47 | +36 | 2.8 | 83% | 52% | 20% | - | 0% | 3.7 | 54% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 52% |
| 7 | Forest Green | 46 | 81 | 50% | 1.8 | 82 | 52 | +30 | 2.9 | 85% | 52% | 33% | - | 0% | 4.2 | 65% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 53% |
| 8 | Halifax | 46 | 70 | 43% | 1.5 | 69 | 66 | +3 | 2.9 | 80% | 63% | 28% | - | 0% | 4.5 | 72% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 48% |
| 9 | Hartlepool | 46 | 68 | 39% | 1.5 | 54 | 59 | -5 | 2.5 | 67% | 41% | 24% | - | 0% | 3.2 | 46% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 47% |
| 10 | Woking | 46 | 63 | 35% | 1.4 | 69 | 54 | +15 | 2.7 | 76% | 48% | 30% | - | 0% | 4.1 | 57% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 50% |
| 11 | Tamworth | 46 | 62 | 37% | 1.3 | 63 | 71 | -8 | 2.9 | 78% | 54% | 33% | - | 0% | 3.8 | 63% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 38% |
| 12 | Boston Utd | 46 | 59 | 33% | 1.3 | 63 | 67 | -4 | 2.8 | 78% | 54% | 28% | - | 0% | 4.1 | 61% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 1.5 | - |
| 13 | Altrincham | 46 | 57 | 37% | 1.2 | 55 | 65 | -10 | 2.6 | 76% | 57% | 20% | - | 0% | 4.6 | 70% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 52% |
| 14 | Solihull | 46 | 56 | 30% | 1.2 | 71 | 72 | -1 | 3.1 | 78% | 52% | 33% | - | 0% | 3.9 | 65% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 48% |
| 15 | Wealdstone | 46 | 56 | 33% | 1.2 | 68 | 76 | -8 | 3.1 | 87% | 57% | 35% | - | 0% | 3.7 | 52% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 57% |
| 16 | Yeovil | 46 | 51 | 33% | 1.1 | 48 | 68 | -20 | 2.5 | 70% | 50% | 20% | - | 0% | 4.1 | 59% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 47% |
| 17 | Eastleigh | 46 | 50 | 28% | 1.1 | 57 | 80 | -23 | 3.0 | 85% | 57% | 35% | - | 0% | 4.2 | 61% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 41% |
| 18 | Gateshead | 46 | 50 | 30% | 1.1 | 54 | 90 | -36 | 3.1 | 85% | 65% | 35% | - | 0% | 3.4 | 50% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 50% |
| 19 | Sutton | 46 | 47 | 24% | 1.0 | 59 | 79 | -20 | 3.0 | 80% | 61% | 33% | - | 0% | 4.5 | 65% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 54% |
| 20 | Aldershot | 46 | 46 | 28% | 1.0 | 69 | 87 | -18 | 3.4 | 89% | 70% | 41% | - | 0% | 4.7 | 70% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 54% |
| 21 | Brackley Town | 46 | 42 | 22% | 0.9 | 40 | 75 | -35 | 2.5 | 74% | 43% | 20% | - | 0% | 4.1 | 59% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 40% |
| 22 | Morecambe | 46 | 38 | 20% | 0.8 | 66 | 103 | -37 | 3.7 | 89% | 70% | 50% | - | 0% | 3.8 | 57% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 49% |
| 23 | Braintree Town | 46 | 36 | 17% | 0.8 | 38 | 76 | -38 | 2.5 | 70% | 48% | 26% | - | 0% | 4.0 | 54% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 48% |
| 24 | Truro | 46 | 34 | 17% | 0.7 | 42 | 72 | -30 | 2.5 | 74% | 43% | 24% | - | 0% | 3.3 | 46% | - | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 44% |